Saudi Arabia Will Get Nuclear if Iran Have One – Saudi the Dog of Israel?

Arab Saudi Commander with US Commander
Arab Saudi Commander with US Commander

A well-known Saudi prince, Prince Turki al-Faisal, said  to senior US and British military leaders that Saudi Arabia will be forced to acquire nuclear weapons of Iran does so, according to a report in Britain’s Guardian newspaper.

Well it’s a pitty of Saudi Arabia want to get nuclear weapon just to fight Iran. Not Israel.
Saudi Arabia also gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites. Is Saudi Arabia now an Israelis’ Dog? Instead of fighting the Jews that occupied Palestine and Masjidil Aqsa, fighting other Muslims and defending Israel?

Saudi Arabia (together with other Arab Nation, US and Europe) has supported Saddam Hussein to attack Iran in Iran-Iraq War. In that war, 2 million Muslims have died.

An Arab Saudi soldier jokes with a US soldier

An Arab Saudi soldier jokes with a US soldier

Why Saudi Arabia wage war against other Muslims instead of Israel? If 1/10 from the 2 million Muslims that died in Iran-Iraq war used to fight Israel, Masjidil Aqsa will be in the hand of Islam now.

The Christians (US and Europe) slaughter millions of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Jews slaughtered millions of Muslims in Palestine. Allah has warned Muslims against the Jews and the Christians:

“The path of those whom Thou hast favoured. Not (the path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray.” [Al Fatihah 7]

“And the Jews will not be pleased with thee, nor will the Christians, till thou follow their creed. Say: Lo! the guidance of Allah (Himself) is Guidance. And if thou shouldst follow their desires after the knowledge which hath come unto thee, then wouldst thou have from Allah no protecting friend nor helper.” [Al Baqarah 120]

A US commander brief Arab Saudi soldiers

A US commander brief Arab Saudi soldiers

So, why the King and the Princes (such as Prince Turki al-Faisal) make friend with the Jews and the Christians and kill other Muslims?

https://muslimjournalist.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/saudi-arabiawill-get-nuclear-if-iran-have-one/

Prince Turki al-Faisal was a former Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States. A Jewish Dog?

Prince Turki al-Faisal was a former Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States. A Jewish Dog?

 

June 12, 2010
Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites
Hugh Tomlinson
For full coverage, pictures and video from the Middle East, try our new website

Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran.

To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return to full alert.

“The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,” said a US defence source in the area. “They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren’t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.”

Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,” said one.

The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete.

The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers’ range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest.

Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an effort to halt the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme, which Tehran claims is intended for civil energy purposes only. President Ahmadinejad has described the UN resolution as “a used handkerchief, which should be thrown in the dustbin”.

Israeli officials refused to comment yesterday on details for a raid on Iran, which the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has refused to rule out. Questioned on the option of a Saudi flight path for Israeli bombers, Aharaon Zeevi Farkash, who headed military intelligence until 2006 and has been involved in war games simulating a strike on Iran, said: “I know that Saudi Arabia is even more afraid than Israel of an Iranian nuclear capacity.”

In 2007 Israel was reported to have used Turkish air space to attack a suspected nuclear reactor being built by Iran’s main regional ally, Syria. Although Turkey publicly protested against the “violation” of its air space, it is thought to have turned a blind eye in what many saw as a dry run for a strike on Iran’s far more substantial — and better-defended — nuclear sites.

Israeli intelligence experts say that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are at least as worried as themselves and the West about an Iranian nuclear arsenal.Israel has sent missile-class warships and at least one submarine capable of launching a nuclear warhead through the Suez Canal for deployment in the Red Sea within the past year, as both a warning to Iran and in anticipation of a possible strike. Israeli newspapers reported last year that high-ranking officials, including the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have met their Saudi Arabian counterparts to discuss the Iranian issue. It was also reported that Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, met Saudi intelligence officials last year to gain assurances that Riyadh would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets violating Saudi airspace during the bombing run. Both governments have denied the reports.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7148555.ece

Riyadh will build nuclear weapons if Iran gets them, Saudi prince warns
Prospect of a nuclear conflict in the Middle East is raised by senior diplomat and member of the Saudi ruling family

Share
3339
reddit this
Jason Burke in Riyadh
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 29 June 2011 17.19 BST
Article history

Prince Turki al-Faisal: he said that if Iran came close to developing nuclear weapons Riyadh would not stand idly by. Photograph: Hassan Ammar/AFP/Getty Images
A senior Saudi Arabian diplomat and member of the ruling royal family has raised the spectre of nuclear conflict in the Middle East if Iran comes close to developing a nuclear weapon.

Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former Saudi intelligence chief and ambassador to Washington, warned senior Nato military officials that the existence of such a device “would compel Saudi Arabia … to pursue policies which could lead to untold and possibly dramatic consequences”.

He did not state explicitly what these policies would be, but a senior official in Riyadh who is close to the prince said yesterday his message was clear.

“We cannot live in a situation where Iran has nuclear weapons and we don’t. It’s as simple as that,” the official said. “If Iran develops a nuclear weapon, that will be unacceptable to us and we will have to follow suit.”

Officials in Riyadh said that Saudi Arabia would reluctantly push ahead with its own civilian nuclear programme. Peaceful use of nuclear power, Turki said, was the right of all nations.

Turki was speaking earlier this month at an unpublicised meeting at RAF Molesworth, the airbase in Cambridgeshire used by Nato as a centre for gathering and collating intelligence on the Middle East and the Mediterranean.

According to a transcript of his speech obtained by the Guardian, Turki told his audience that Iran was a “paper tiger with steel claws” that was “meddling and destabilising” across the region.

“Iran … is very sensitive about other countries meddling in its affairs. But it should treat others like it expects to be treated. The kingdom expects Iran to practise what it preaches,” Turki said.

Turki holds no official post in Saudi Arabia but is seen as an ambassador at large for the kingdom and a potential future foreign minister,

Diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks and published by the Guardian last year revealed that King Abdullah, who has ruled Saudi Arabia since 2005, had privately warned Washington in 2008 that if Iran developed nuclear weapons “everyone in the region would do the same, including Saudi Arabia”.

Saudi Arabian diplomats and officials have launched a serious campaign in recent weeks to rally global and regional powers against Iran, fearful that their country’s larger but poorer regional rival is exploiting the Arab Spring to gain influence in the region and within the kingdom itself.

Turki also accused Iran of interfering in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and in the Gulf state of Bahrain, where Saudi troops were deployed this year as part of a Gulf Co-operation Council force following widespread protests from those calling for greater democratic rights.

Though there has previously been little public comment from Riyadh on developments in Syria, Turki told his audience at Molesworth that President Bashar al-Assad “will cling to power till the last Syrian is killed”.

Syria presents a dilemma for Saudi policymakers: although they would prefer not to see popular protest unseat another regime in the region, they view the Damascus regime, which is dominated by members of Syria’s Shia minority, as a proxy for Iran.

“The loss of life [in Syria] in the present internal struggle is deplorable. The government is woefully deficient in its handling of the situation,” Turki said at the Molesworth meeting, which took place on 8 June.

Though analysts say demonstrations in Bahrain were not sectarian in nature, two senior Saudi officials in Riyadh said this week that Tehran had mobilised the largely Shia protesters against the Sunni rulers of the Gulf state. Iran has a predominantly Shia population. Around 15% of Saudis are Shia. The officials described this minority, which suffers extensive discrimination despite recent attempts at reform, as “vulnerable to external influence”.

Though there has been negligible unrest internally, Saudi Arabia has been shaken by the events across the Arab world in recent months and has watched anxiously as a number of allies – such as President Hosni Mubarak – have been ousted or have found themselves in grave difficulties. President Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen is being treated in a Saudi Arabian hospital for wounds caused by a mysterious blast that forced him to leave his country this month.

The former Tunisian ruler Zine al-Abedine ben Ali, whose relations with Riyadh were complex, is reported to have been housed in a luxurious villa in the Red Sea port city of Jeddah after he fled his homeland for Saudi Arabia.

Saudi officials admitted that decision-makers in Saudi Arabia were “not keen” on demonstrators ousting governments, but said they were “even less keen on killing and massacres”.

Turki also warned that al-Qaida has been able to create “a sanctuary not unlike Pakistan’s tribal areas” in Yemen.

Saudi Arabian foreign policy historically has been pro-western, although differences have emerged with the United States in recent years. The Arab Spring has also caused some tension, with the deployment of troops in Bahrain opposed by Washington.

There has also been conflict following western charges that the kingdom has exported radical strands of Islam around the Muslim world.Turki said that “in all areas, Islam must play a central yet development role” and insisted that “closer monitoring” now ensured that funds raised in the kingdom “were not misused”.

Internally, Saudi Arabia faced problems because of the youthfulness of its population, radicalism and different sectarian identities, Turki said.

Senior officials at the ministry of interior in Riyadh said that Iran was using ideology to “penetrate” the Arabian peninsula “in the same way al-Qaida did”.

Turki also reiterated a long-standing Saudi call for a nuclear free zone in the Middle East, which would include both Iran and Israel and would be enforced by the United Nations security council.

The prince said sanctions against Iran were working. He welcomed the consensus in Washington that military strikes against Tehran would be counterproductive.

Analysts said that Turki’s words about developing nuclear arms may have been intended to focus western attention on Saudi concerns about their regional rival rather than to indicate any kind of definite decision by Riyadh because the practical and diplomatic obstacles of doing so would be immense.

William Hague, Britain’s foreign secretary said that Iran has recently conducted covert tests of ballistic missiles as well as at least three secret tests of medium-range ballistic missiles since October.

Iran and the west remain in dispute over its nuclear programme. The US and its allies insist Tehran aims to develop atomic weapons, a charge that Iran rejects.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/29/saudi-build-nuclear-weapons-iran

SAUDI PRINCE WARNS IRAN ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS. By Ray Moseley
Thursday, 30 June 2011

Prince Turki al-Faisal was a former Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States. (File photo)

By RAY MOSELEY
AL ARABIYA LONDON
A well-known Saudi prince has given a broad hint to senior US and British military leaders that Saudi Arabia will be forced to acquire nuclear weapons of Iran does so, according to a report in Britain’s Guardian newspaper.

Prince Turki al-Faisal, believed to be a prospective foreign minister, made the disclosure at a closed meeting held at RAF Molesworth, one of three British bases used by American forces since World War II. It is now a NATO intelligence center dealing with the Mediterranean and Middle East.

“Iran (developing) a nuclear weapon would compel Saudi Arabia…to pursue policies which could lead to untold and possibly dramatic consequences,” the prince was quoted as saying.

“If they successfully pursue a military program, we will have to follow suit.”

Guardian correspondent Jason Burke said he did not specifically say Saudi Arabia would acquire nuclear weapons of Iran does. But he quoted a senior Saudi adviser as telling the Guardian it would be “inconceivable that there would be a day when Iran had a nuclear weapon and Saudi Arabia did not.”

The report lends weight to a WikiLeaks disclosure last year of diplomatic cables stating that Saudi King Abdullah privately warned Washington in 2008 that if Iran developed nuclear weapons, “everyone in the region would do the same, including Saudi Arabia.”

A former intelligence chief and former ambassador to Washington, Prince Turki was reported to have called the loss of life in Syria during the current uprising against President Bashar Al Assad as “deplorable.”

“The government is woefully deficient in its handling of the situation,” he said, but added that President Assad “will cling to power till the last Syrian is killed.”

The Guardian said Saudi officials in Riyadh were “not keen” on demonstrators ousting governments, but “even less keen on killing and massacres.”

The Guardian said it had obtained a transcript of Prince Turki’s speech, in which he warned that military strikes to prevent Iran from producing nuclear weapons would be “counterproductive.” He said sanctions against the Tehran regime were working.

The prince was reported to have said that an alternative to military strikes would be to “squeeze” Iran’s profits from oil, something the Saudis could do with their spare pumping capacity.

The newspaper said Saudi Arabia is reported to have an “option” on acquiring Pakistan’s nuclear capability, in event of Iran getting the bomb, in return for Saudi financing of Pakistan for several decades.

Prince Faisal was reported to have made clear that Saudi Arabia was using its vast oil wealth to minimize potential ill-will toward Riyadh among populations whose authoritarian rulers have been backed by Saudi Arabia.

It has spent $2.5 billion since 2006 in Lebanon to counter Syrian influence and the Shia Hezbollah movement, and Prince Turki said several billion more will go to Palestinians. Saudi Arabia also has offered $4 billion in aid to Egypt. He said that stands “in stark comparison to the conditional loans that the US and Europe have promised.”

Before his downfall, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak enjoyed strong support from Saudi Arabia.

Prince Turki was reported to have reiterated a long-standing Saudi appeal for a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East, embracing Iran and Israel and enforced by the United Nations Security Council.

He also touched on the troubles in Yemen and said that country’s more remote tribal areas had become a safe haven for terrorism comparable to Pakistan’s tribal areas.

(Ray Moseley is a London-based former chief European correspondent of the Chicago Tribune and has worked extensively in the Middle East. He can be reached at rnmoseley@aol.com.)

http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/30/155487.html

One Response

  1. THE ROTHSCHILDS PLAN WORLD WAR III WITH THE AID OF THEIR SAUDI PUPPETS

    ” LEAFLET: On the Eve of War—Glass-Steagall Now Would Change Everything
    October 25, 2013 • 9:16AM

    Over this past week, a series of meetings which took place between the heads of state of China, India, and Russia indicate a sense of urgency among those three nations to step up discussions and collaboration, at a time when the Obama-led United States and a bankrupt Europe continue to push the world security situation to the brink of disaster.

    Download PDF

    http://larouchepac.com/node/28655

    “Prince Bandar Threatens US; Another 9/11 Coming?
    October 22, 2013 • 4:50PM

    Saudi Arabia’s Prince of Terror Bandar bin Sultan, head of Saudi intelligence, issued a public warning to the US over the weekend. The Wall Street Journal reports that Bandar “invited a Western diplomat to the Saudi Red Sea city of Jeddah over the weekend to voice Riyadh’s frustration with the Obama administration and its regional policies,” telling the unnamed diplomat that Saudi Arabia would cut back cooperation with the US (the CIA and others) on arming the Syrian rebels due to Washington’s failure to bomb Syria, the peace talks with Iran, and other regional issues, which stand in the way of the British/Saudi sponsored Sunni-Shia long war. Bandar said the Saudis would work with others on the Syria project, such as Jordan and France, rather than the US.
    In regard to Saudi Arabia’s announced rejection of the offer to join the United Nations Security Council (after campaigning to get on), Bandar said : “This was a message for the U.S., not the U.N..”
    Bandar has been documented by LaRouche’s EIR and others to have been the primary Saudi controller of the 9/11 attck on the United States by Saudi terrorist, at least several of whom were sponsored and funded by Bandar, who at the time was ambassador to the U.S., and his wife. The censored 28 pages of the 9/11 report which Obama refuses to release, document some of these facts.
    Bandar has gone balistic since Obama was forced to give up his planned war on Syria. Bandar went to Moscow to attempt to bribe and/or threaten Putin to support the war — in fact, several terrorist attacks in the region of the planned winter Olympics in Sochi are likely due to Bandar carrying out those threats when Putin refused to give in.
    Meanwhile, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal hosted a lunch for Secretary John Kerry at his private residence in Paris on Monday. A senior State Department official told reporters after the lunch that Kerry tried to convince the Saudis to take the UN seat, telling Saud that the US “values Saudi Arabia’s leadership in the region and the international community”, the US official said.
    What that leadership means was demonstrated on Monday, when Prince Bandar followed up his threat to the US with a meeting in Jeddah, bringing Saudi King Abdullah, King Abdullah of Jordan and UAE Defense Minister (and heir apparent) Mohammad ben Zayed. All the intelligence, defense and security chiefs of the three countries were present (with Bandar heading the gang, of course). The theme, according to the Saudi press was to “have a comprehensive discussion about the current developments in the Arab world, the region and the world”!
    Present in the meeting was Prince Salman ben Sultan, deputy defense minister of Saudi Arabia and the field coordinator from Jordan of the Saudi invasion into southern Syria, and most probably the architect of the Ghouta chemical weapons provocation. Note that Salman has been working with Bandar for many years, including the period of preparation of the 9/11 attack, as Salman was working in the Embassy in Washington under Bandar!
    The editorial of the London-based Saudi daily Asharq Al-Awsat writes that Prince Salman, the Crown Prince, who said in the summit of the Organization of Islamic Conference recently: “If we fail to get the support in the UN, we will have to turn our back to the UN and build our own capabilities to solve our problems with our hands!” ” http://larouchepac.com/node/28623
    ( Saudis Alarmed by Signs of U.S. Institutional Criticism http://larouchepac.com/node/28604 )
    ( It’s Time to Release 28 pages on Saudi Role in 9/11, as Prince Bandar Threatens World Peace http://larouchepac.com/node/28630 http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2000/terror_memo_2703.html )

    “Real Target of Saudi Hysteria Is U.S. War-Avoidance Forces
    October 24, 2013 • 2:32PM

    On Tuesday, Oct. 22, the former head of Saudi intelligence at the time of the 9/11 attacks, Prince Turki bin-Faisal, delivered a tirade against the United States that mirrored the attack the same day in the Wall Street Journal by Prince Bandar bin-Sultan. However, the broadside freakout was not directed against President Obama, but against the war-avoidance faction that forced Obama to “blink” and reverse orders for the massive planned attack on Syria.
    Saudi embassy, Washington, D.C.
    Prince Turki assailed the United States for failing to launch military strikes against Syria, and claimed that the Kingdom had rejected the coveted seat on the UN Security Council, because Washington had failed to bomb Syria and because Russia and China persisted in vetoing UN sanctioned military action. To make matters perfectly clear, Prince Turki singled out General Martin Dempsey for special attack, because he refused to follow President Obama’s explicit orders to arm the Syrian rebels, orders that General Dempsey said were not in the Pentagon’s plans. For this, Prince Turki accused Gen. Dempsey of giving “comfort and solace to criminals.”
    Prince Turki made clear that Saudi Arabia is opposed to the P5+1 talks with Iran, because Iran’s actions in the region go far beyond the nuclear issue and involve Iranian destabilizations throughout the region, particularly in Bahrain. Mirroring Bandar, Prince Turki threatened that Saudi Arabia would seek alliances with France and Turkey.
    Prince Turki’s remarks were delivered during the keynote luncheon at the 30th annual conference of the National Council on US-Arab Relations in Washington. After concluding his remarks, Turki left the stage without taking any questions. He was immediately followed by General Lloyd Austin, the new Commander-in-Chief of the Central Command. While Gen. Austin’s remarks were prepared in advance, at one point in his speech, he responded directly to Prince Turki.
    During discussion of Syria, Gen. Austin focused on Al Nusra and other Al Qaeda-linked jihadist groups operating in Syria and, in clear and loud voice, warned that they are one of the greatest threats to regional peace and security. He identified them as foreign-funded foreign fighters who are getting combat experience in Syria and will return, well-armed, to their home countries throughout the CENTCOM region to pose a durable terrorist threat. While he did not mention Prince Turki’s speech or Saudi Arabia by name, it was clear to everyone in the audience of about 1,000 attendees that he was directly responding to the attacks on the U.S. war-avoidance efforts.
    According to one former U.S. ambassador attending the NCUSAR event, the Saudis were, indeed, furious at the U.S. military for refusing Saudi demands to be given the target list of the planned U.S. missile assaults on Syria, which President Obama had ordered and then cancelled. According to the former ambassador, the planned strikes involved more than 500 cruise missiles. ” http://larouchepac.com/node/28647

    ” Ken Cummings: Profile of a Self-Asserted Saudi Asset
    September 19, 2013 • 10:29AM

    The following report posted on LaRouche PAC on Sept. 19 needs to be recalled and rubbed in the faces of these and other paid stooges of the British-Saudi Nazi operations, in light of Prince Bandar’s latest threats against the U.S.
    On September 13th, Congressional Staffer Kenneth Cummings, an aide to Congressman Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, was presented with the evidence that Saudi Arabia was behind both 9/11 attacks on the United States, on US soil in 2001 and in Benghazi, Libya in 2012, and that the Saudis were also funding and arming Al-Qaeda in Syria. Cummings response to the representatives of LaRouche PAC was to repeatedly insist that “We need the Saudis.” Cummings further asserted that the Congressional leadership would never allow the declassification of the 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission report which details the Saudi financing and operational role in that horrific terrorist assault.
    On August 25th, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “A Veteran Saudi Power Player works to Build Support to Topple Assad,” which documents the role of Saudi Arabia’s Prince Bandar bin Sultan in lavishly lobbying members of Congress to support Saudi Arabia’s genocidal wars in the Middle East. Multiple intelligence sources have reported that Saudi largesse, in the form of massive contributions, is flowing to members of Congress. Prince Bandar was the Saudi Ambassador to the United States at the time of the 9/11/2001 attacks and his wife, Princess Haifa Al-Faisal wrote checks to the networks around Omar Al-Bayoumi, the handler of the terrorists who murdered our fellow citizens twelve years ago.
    Was Kenneth Cummings speaking for himself, or, was he speaking for Congressman Van Hollen who is part of the Democratic Party leadership? If Cummings was speaking out of turn, then Van Hollen should fire him. If this is Van Hollen’s position, then Van Hollen should explain his support for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which is an enemy of the United States, as has been documented in the withheld pages of the 9/11 Commission Report.
    The Constitution defines treason as “adherence to the enemies of the United States” and “giving them aid and comfort.” Lyndon LaRouche has characterized the continuing support for Saudi Arabia by members of Congress or their staffs as treasonous, given what is known or is readily available to be known about the Saudi role in direct attacks on this country.
    In a recent press release, Congressman Walter Jones (R-NC) issued a call for the declassification of the 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report. “As we commemorate the 12th anniversary of 9/11, it saddens me that vital evidence of this heinous attack is still being withheld from the American people. As a member of Congress, I had the opportunity to read the 28 pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into the attacks that have not been made public, and I believe that keeping this information classified is more about protecting powerful interests than our national security.”
    Former Senator Bob Graham, Congressman Jones, and the families of the 9/11 victims have repeatedly called for the release of this information to obtain justice and closure. Congress remains largely silent based on Saudi money, influence, and cowardice in the face of a secret government apparatus which dates from the days of J. Edgar Hoover and Allen Dulles. It is time to end all of this — release the 28 pages now. ”
    http://larouchepac.com/node/28201 http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2000/terror_memo_2703.html

    ” Bandar Threatens U.S. and Foreign Journalists Who Exposed Syrian Rebel Role in Chemical Attack
    September 23, 2013 • 5:20PM

    The two journalists who authored the August 29, 2013 story, “Syrians in Goutha claim Saudi-supplied rebels behind chemical attacks,” published by Mint Press, have been threatened with having their careers “ended” if they do not disavow the story, and both journalists have told Mint Press that they believe that the pressure comes from Saudi Arabia. One author, Yayha Ababneh, who conducted the interviews on the ground that were the guts of the story, told MintPress that he received threats from the Saudi Embassy in Jordan, his home country. Dale Gavlak, the other reporter, an American, has been suspended by Associated Press, and further subjected to “immense amounts of pressure,” according to Mint Press, which said she believes the source of pressure to be Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the head of Saudi intelligence.
    Bandar, the former Ambassador to the United States at the time of the 911 attacks, left that post after exposes that showed his wife had provided funding for 911 hijackers through a Saudi Arabian intelligence operative living in the U.S., and after exposes that he had received bribe funds in the range of $2 billion from BAE (formerly called British Aerospace) for arranging the Al Yamamah defense contract deal with Saudi Arabia. Bandar is also a major figure in the suppressed “28 pages” of the report on the 911 attack produced by the U.S. Congress. The “28 pages” were “classified” and pulled from distribution because of their detailed information about the role of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, its charities, bank accounts and nationals in the funding of the 911 attack.
    On September 21, MintPress which was founded earlier this year and is edited by Mnar Muhawesh, a Palestinian American journalist, put out a lengthy statement in response to Gavlak’s claims that she had not authored the August 29 story.
    MintPress editor Ms. Muhawesh wrote:
    “Dale [Gavlak] is under mounting pressure for writing this article by third parties. She notified MintPress editors and myself on August 30th and 31st via email and phone call, that third parties were placing immense amounts of pressure on her over the article and were threatening to end her career over it. She went on to tell us that she believes this third party was under pressure from the head of the Saudi Intelligence Prince Bandar himself, who is alleged in the article of supplying the rebels with chemical weapons.
    “On August 30th, Dale asked MintPress to remove her name completely from the byline because she stated that her career and reputation was at risk. She continued to say that these third parties were demanding her to disassociate herself from the article or these parties would end her career. On August 31st, I notified Dale through email that I would add a clarification that she was the writer and researcher for the article and that Yahya was the reporter on the ground….
    “Yahya [Ababneh] has recently notified me that the Saudi embassy contacted him and threatened to end his career if he did a follow up story on who carried out the most recent chemical weapons attack and demanded that he stop doing media interviews in regards to the subject.”
    The statement from MintPress adds, “We are aware of the tremendous pressure that Dale and some of our other journalists are facing as a result of this story, and we are under the same pressure as a result to discredit the story. We are unwilling to succumb to those pressures for MintPress holds itself to the highest journalistic ethics and reporting standards….”
    In terms of Gavlak’s role, MintPress says:
    “Gavlak pitched this story to MintPress on August 28th and informed her editors and myself that her colleague Yahya Ababneh was on the ground in Syria. She said Ababneh conducted interviews with rebels, their family members, Ghouta residents and doctors that informed him through various interviews that the Saudis had supplied the rebels with chemical weapons and that rebel fighters handled the weapons improperly setting off the explosions.
    “When Yahya had returned and shared the information with her, she stated that she confirmed with several colleagues and Jordanian government officials that the Saudis have been supplying rebels with chemical weapons, but as her email states, she says they refused to go on the record.
    “Gavlak wrote the article in its entirety as well as conducted the research. She filed her article on August 29th and was published on the same day.” [all emphasis in the original] ”
    http://larouchepac.com/node/28248 http://larouchepac.com/node/28287

    WHO CONTROLS BANDAR, THE SAUDIS AND AL QAEDA ?

    1) ” One of the most important British assets in this global genocide scheme is Prince Bandar. Trained in Britain, Bandar was not only the Saudi interlocutor with the British Crown and BAE in forging the original Al Yamamah deal. As Saudi Ambassador in Washington (and as practically an adopted son of George H.W. Bush), Bandar presided over the Saudi intelligence officers who shepherded the 9/11 hijackers for a year, leading up to the September 2001 attacks. His wife, Princess Haifa, provided cover for Bandar’s direct financing of at least one team of the hijackers.” http://larouchepac.com/node/27794
    (LONDON CENTER OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL MAFIA ? http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2000/terror_memo_2703.html )
    BAE SYSTEM IS CONNECTED ALSO WITH SHELL AND BP.
    ” The BAE-Saudi deal is essentially an oil-for-weapons swap involving the largest British weapons manufacturer, and a nation that is essentially a creature of the London-centered international oil cartel, in which Royal Dutch Shell and BP are major factors. Associated with this BAE-Shell-BP nexus are a number of important investment and commercial banks, other weapons manufacturers, and raw materials companies.”
    http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/3427bae_slimemold.html
    BLACKROCK IS A SHAREHOLDER OF SHELL AND BP.
    ” Shell is also one of the world’s most valuable companies.[3] As of January, 2013 the largest shareholder is Capital Research Global Investors with 9.85% ahead of BlackRock in second with 6.89%.[4]”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Dutch_Shell
    ” At the time of the Deepwater Horizon blowout, Blackrock was the single largest shareholder of BP.” http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/BlackRock
    ” Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Barclays PLC own economic interests in BlackRock approximating 34.1%, 24.6% and 19.9%, respectively, with the remainder owned by institutional and individual investors, as well as BlackRock employees.”
    http://publicintelligence.net/blackrock-inc/
    Bank of America is connected with the person of Warren Buffet a notorious friend of Lord JACOB ROTHSCHILD.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/14/warren-buffett-ibm_n_1092165.html
    Lord JACOB ROTHSCHILD “Hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002 at Waddesdon Manor, attended by such figures as James Wolfensohn, Nicky Oppenheimer, Warren Buffet, and Arnold Schwarzenegger ” https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/organisations/introduction/PEHI_Jacob_de_Rothschild_bio.htm
    Bank Of America and Merrill Lynch are also related with the Edmond De Rothschild, owned by BENJAMIN DE ROTHSCHILD AND ARIANE DE ROTHSCHILD, through the persons of Gerald Levy, Matthieu Walterspiler, Barbara Colombo, Beate Bakker, etc… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_de_Rothschild https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_de_Rothschild
    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/gerald-levy/60/b49/b87 http://uk.linkedin.com/in/walterspiler http://www.linkedin.com/pub/barbara-colombo/26/b21/766 http://ch.linkedin.com/pub/beate-bakker/16/a55/491
    Warren Buffet is also a friend of EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD.
    https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/organisations/introduction/PEHI_Evelyn_de_Rothschild_bio.htm
    Barclays is a bank related with the British Crown and therefore connected with Lord JACOB ROTHSCHILD and EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD.
    ” Lord JACOB ROTHSCHILD, the behind-the-scenes controller of the Inter-Alpha Group, was a partner at Rothschild at the time he set up the Inter-Alpha Group in 1971, using its resources and then leaving in 1980 to continue his special mission, which includes advising the genocidal British Crown and managing the funds of Prince Charles’ Duchy of Cornwall, to finance his kooky, “green” schemes.”
    http://unitednationsoffilm.com/?p=1728
    ” Prince Charles already played polo with EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD in his student years and later set up the Interfaith consultations with him. ”
    http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/people_with_the_endless_bios.htm
    EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD ” In 1989, he was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II,[2] for whom he serves as a financial adviser. ” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Robert_de_Rothschild
    Barclays Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland are also linked with the Edmond De Rothschild and therefore with BENJAMIN DE ROTHSCHILD AND ARIANE DE ROTHSCHILD.
    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/laura-scolan/a/ba1/7b7 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mark-phillips/4/5b9/772 http://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-corsetti/a/67a/44a http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nicolas-jugniot/b/78/884
    CONSEQUENTLY BP, SHELL, BAE AND BANDAR HAVE LINKS WITH JACOB ROTHSCHILD, BENJAMIN DE ROTHSCHILD, ARIANE DE ROTHSCHILD AND EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Rothschild,_4th_Baron_Rothschild https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_de_Rothschild
    http://www.lejdd.fr/Economie/Images/Les-plus-grosses-fortunes-de-France/Benjamin-de-Rothschild-206941 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_de_Rothschild https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Robert_de_Rothschild
    ” Al-Massari is allied with the well-known Saudi expatriate Osama bin Laden, who, to this day, maintains a residence in the wealthy London suburb of Wembly. And London is the headquarters of bin Laden’s Advise and Reform Commission, run by the London-based Khalid al-Fawwaz.
    Bin Laden has been given regular access to BBC and a variety of major British newspapers, to spread his calls for jihad against the United States. Thus, in July 1996, bin Laden told the London Independent, “What happened in Khobar [the U.S. Army barracks that was bombed on June 25] is a clear proof of the enormous rage of the Saudi population against them. Resistance against America will spread in many places through Muslim lands.” http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2000/terror_memo_2703.html

    2) BANDAR, THE SAUDIS AND AL QAEDA ARE ALSO LINKED WITH THE BUSH FAMILY AND CARLYLE.
    ( THE BUSH FAMILY’S BRITISH FASCISM http://larouchepac.com/node/27310 )
    ” former President George H. W. Bush, then a senior adviser to Carlyle ”
    ” The Bush family has had a long and mutually profitable connection with the corrupt Saudi oil dictatorship. Prince Bandar, Saudi ambassador to the United States, has been an honored guest both at the Bush I summer home in Kennebunkport, Maine, and at Bush 11’s getaway in Crawford, Texas (hence his nickname, “Bandar Bush”). Bandar expressed his gratitude to Bush I by donating $1 million to the Bush Presidential Library in Texas. And Bandar’s prodding prompted Saudi King Fahd to send another $1 million to Barbara Bush’s campaign against illiteracy.
    Saudi Prince al-Walid contributed half a million petrodollars to help launch the George Herbert Walker Bush Scholarship Fund at Phillips Academy, the alma mater of both Bush presidents. The depth of these connections was highlighted when the former president visited the Saudis to “discuss U.S.-Saudi business relations” with Crown Prince Abdullah during his son’s 2000 presidential campaign.
    And then there is the bin Laden problem. The bin Laden family, a key Carlyle investor, stood to make millions of dollars from the war on terror-a war that has as its chief villain a member of their own family. The bin Ladens withdrew from the Carlyle Group in late October 2001, but it’s not just the bin Laden family proper that was problematic for the Bushes. It turns out that Prince Bandar’s wife, Princess Haifa, had made charitable contributions that may have helped finance two of the 9/11 hijackers. ” http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Bush_Gang/CarlyleGroup_TETTR.html
    ” Carlyle emerged from the shadows in spite of itself on September 11, 2001. That day, the group had organized a meeting at Washington’s Ritz Carlton Hotel with five hundred of its largest investors. Frank Carlucci and James Baker III played masters of ceremony. George Bush senior made a lightning appearance at the beginning of the day. The presentation was quickly interrupted, but one detail escaped no one. One of the guests wore the name bin Laden on his badge. It was Shafiq bin Laden, one of Osama’s many brothers. The American media discovered Carlyle. One journalist, Dan Briody, wrote a book about the group’s hidden side, “The Iron Triangle”, and takes an interest in the close relations between the Bush clan and the Saudi leadership.” http://www.culturechange.org/CarlyleEmpire.html
    ” The collection of influential characters who now work, have worked, or have invested in the [ Carlyle ] group would make the most convinced conspiracy theorists incredulous. They include among others, John Major, former British Prime Minister; Fidel Ramos, former Philippines President; Park Tae Joon, former South Korean Prime Minister; Saudi Prince Al-Walid; Colin Powell, the present Secretary of State; James Baker III, former Secretary of State; Caspar Weinberger, former Defense Secretary; Richard Darman, former White House Budget Director; the billionaire George Soros, and even some bin Laden family members. You can add Alice Albright, daughter of Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State; Arthur Lewitt, former SEC head; William Kennard, former head of the FCC, to this list. Finally, add in the Europeans: Karl Otto Poehl, former Bundesbank president; the now-deceased Henri Martre, who was president of Aerospatiale; and Etienne Davignon, former president of the Belgian Generale Holding Company ” http://www.culturechange.org/CarlyleEmpire.html
    CARLYLE IS CONNECTED WITH BLACKSTONE, DEUTSCHE BANK AND MANY OTHER COMPANIES.
    ” Carlyle is the 11th largest defense contractor in the US. It is 20%-owned by Mellon Bank (http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Mellon_family) and is controlled by the powerful Blackstone Group (seeOverthrow of the American Republic), which dined cheaply on the carcasses of looted S&L’s at auctions held by Bush Sr.’s Resolution Trust Corporation. ”
    http://www.almartinraw.com/uri1.html http://transmissionsmedia.com/the-911-illusion-part-ii-deutsche-bank-blackstone/
    ” Henry Kissinger’s good friend Lord JACOB ROTHSCHILD sat on Bioport owner Blackstone’s International Advisory Board. (See Corexit Linked to the Blackstone Group and Lord Jacob Rothschild) ”
    http://transmissionsmedia.com/the-911-illusion-part-ii-deutsche-bank-blackstone/ http://beforeitsnews.com/gulf-oil-spill/2010/06/corexit-linked-to-the-blackstone-group-and-lord-jacob-rothschild-76363.html
    ” Blackstone was founded in 1985 as a mergers and acquisitions boutique by Peter G. Peterson and Stephen A. Schwarzman, who had previously worked together at Lehman Brothers, Kuhn, Loeb Inc. ”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone_Group
    Peter G. Peterson ” is founding Chairman of the Peterson Institute for International Economics ” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_George_Peterson
    Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the wife of Sir EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD, is a director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics. http://www.petersoninstitute.org/institute/board.cfm
    Blackstone is also related with the LCF EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD owned by BENJAMIN DE ROTHSCHILD and by his wife ARIANE DE ROTHSCHILD, for example through the person of Daniel Costa Lindo that is a M&A Analyst at Blackstone and was Private Equity Analyst at LCF Edmond de Rothschild. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/daniel-costa-lindo/32/255/543
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_de_Rothschild http://www.lejdd.fr/Economie/Images/Les-plus-grosses-fortunes-de-France/Benjamin-de-Rothschild-206941 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_de_Rothschild

    3) ” RUPERT MURDOCH AND LORD ROTHSCHILD: THE OIL BARONS OF OCCUPIED SYRIA

    Written by Christopher Bollyn

    UNETHICAL JOURNALISM – FOX News supports military action against the Assad government of Syria but does not inform its viewers that the network’s owner, Rupert Murdoch, is part-owner of an oil exploration company illegally exploiting the resources of Israeli-occupied Syria.
    Millions of Americans get their news from FOX News, the Wall Street Journal, or through some other news outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch. FOX News and Murdoch-owned news outlets generally support U.S. military action against Syria, but they do not inform their viewers and readers that Mr. Murdoch has a vested interest in war with Syria. Rupert Murdoch is part-owner of an Israeli-American company that has been granted the rights to explore for oil on the Golan Heights – Israeli-occupied Syrian land. It is highly unethical for FOX News not to disclose this information to its viewers.
    Israel has granted oil exploration rights inside Syria, in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, to Genie Energy. Rupert Murdoch and Lord Jacob Rothschild are major shareholders of Genie Energy – which also has interests in shale gas in the United States and shale oil in Israel. Dick Cheney is also on the company’s advisory board.
    It is illegal under international law for Israel to grant oil exploration rights on occupied territory, as Craig Murray wrote in his February 2013 article “Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild”:
    For Israel to seek to exploit mineral reserves in the occupied Golan Heights is plainly illegal in international law. Japan was successfully sued by Singapore before the International Court of Justice for exploitation of Singapore’s oil resources during the Second World War. The argument has been made in international law that an occupying power is entitled to operate oil wells which were previously functioning and operated by the sovereign power, in whose position the occupying power now stands. But there is absolutely no disagreement in the authorities and case law that the drilling of new wells – let alone fracking – by an occupying power is illegal.
    The fact that Jacob Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch are invested in oil exploration efforts in occupied Syria suggests that they support the overthrow of the Assad government in Damascus in order to weaken Syria and divide the nation in much the same way as Yugoslavia was dismembered in the 1990s. ”
    http://therebel.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=686198:rupert-murdoch-and-lord-rothschild-the-oil-barons-of-occupied-syria&catid=139:bollyn&Itemid=1310&acm=636_685

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: