2. Gaddafi open US embassy in Libya. US Embassy spread spies all over Libya and bribed people to be their goons to rebels against Gaddafi.

3. Gaddafi save Libya’s money in US dollar in US Banks. US freeze Libya’s US$ 150 billion money easily.
Gaddafi could not buy weapons and pay soldiers because loosing a lot of money because of that.
Actually Gaddafi should save it in gold and silver in Libya or other Islamic Countries (but not US allies) so the money is safe.

They have 5,000 nuclear bombs to kill human.

Yet, when Iran want a Nuclear Reactor to provide electricity for its people, they yell like a mad dog and try to make a war on Iran.

In the last 100 years, it’s US and the Israel that attack other countries such as Palestine, Japan, Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc and slay millions of people there. Mean while Iran has never attack any country.

IAEA reported the “Possibility” that Iran could make a nuclear bomb.

But has IAEA reported that US and Israel already make 5,000 nuclear bombs?

At last, US (especially the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers) prosper because robbing many countries natural resources. Not because of their honest business.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/around-the-world-abc-news/iran-bomb-next-044310658.html

Iran & The Bomb: What’s Next?
By Christiane Amanpour, Matthew Drake & David Miller | Around the World –

Questions about Iran’s nuclear program have been swirling for years causing fear in the west that they are secretly preparing to build a nuclear warhead.
Iran has steadfastly maintained that their nuclear ambitions are only for the purpose of energy production, and that they have no plans to enrich uranium for the production of nuclear weapons.
However, a new IAEA 25-page report, a decade in the making, says there is credible evidence to make a case that “Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear device.”
This is some of the most damning evidence ever released about Iran’s nuclear interest, but Iran has blasted the report, calling it politically motivated by the west, and an excuse to carry out military action against Iran.
While the report does not claim that Iran has the technology to produce a nuclear weapon yet, it does site evidence that Iran “had been provided with nuclear explosive design information” as well as computer modeling of nuclear detonations.
On Around the World, Christiane Amanpour speaks with the New York Times David Sanger to take a deeper look into this report which could have a worldwide impact, effecting not only the United States and Iran, but also putting pressure on Iran’s allies China and Russia.

Photos of US Soldiers Brutalities:

(Prior to the murder of Mudin, in November 2009, the soldiers of Bravo Company were dispatched to recover the body of an insurgent who was killed by rockets from a helicopter gunship. As they collected the remains, which appear to be those shown here, one took out a hunting knife and stabbed the corpse. Staff Sgt. Gibbs, who had recently joined the platoon as a squad leader, began playing with a pair of scissors near the dead man’s hands. “I wonder if these can cut off a finger?” Gibbs asked).Ini foto berikutnya:

(In a break with protocol, the soldiers also took photographs of themselves celebrating their kill. In the photos, Cpl. Jeremy Morlock (21) grins and gives a thumbs-up sign as he poses with Gul Mudin’s body (15). Note that the boy’s right pinky finger appears to have been severed. Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs reportedly used a pair of razor-sharp medic’s shears to cut off the finger, which he presented to Pfc. Andrew Holmes as a trophy for killing his first Afghan. Mudin was wearing a little cap and a Western-style green jacket. He held nothing in his hand that could be interpreted as a weapon, not even a shovel. The expression on his face was welcoming. “He was not a threat,” Morlock later confessed).

(A sign – handwritten on cardboard fashioned from a discarded box of rations – hangs around the dead men’s necks. It reads: TALIBAN ARE DEAD. According to a source in Bravo Company, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the men were killed by soldiers from another platoon, which has not yet been implicated in the scandal. “Those were some innocent farmers that got killed,” the source says. “Their standard operating procedure after killing dudes was to drag them up to the side of the highway”).

(The collection of photos includes several dozen images of unidentified casualties, including this one of a severed head. In many of the photos it is unclear whether the bodies are civilians or Taliban. It is possible that the unidentified deaths are unrelated to 3rd Platoon, and involved no illegal acts by U.S. soldiers. But taking such photos, let alone sharing them with others, is a clear violation of Army standards).

 

Israelis Brutalities

Source: http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=629258

No wonder 1.3 billion Muslims all over the world could not defeat Israel which only has 6 million people. Almost all Muslim leaders become US allies. US is the main supporter of Israel.

No wonder also that US could defeat Iraq and Afghanistan easily and kill almost 2 million Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is because the Arabian Syaikh and Princes save their US$ 3 Trillion money from oil and gas in US Banks. The US could lend the money for war or at least they get billions of dollars from the interest.

Some Islamic Leaders in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Yaman, Pakistan, Qatar, Turkey, Turkmenistan  also provide land for US Military bases. With those Bases, US Jet fighter could bomb Iraq, Afghanistan, and also Pakistan easily. Without the Bases, US Jet Fighters that only have range 1,300 km could not easily bomb Muslims from US or Europe Bases.

With the fall of Libya and soon Syiria, more Islamic countries become US puppet.

“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers – so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward.” [Al Fath 29]

“O you who have believed, whoever of you should revert from his religion – Allah will bring forth [in place of them] a people He will love and who will love Him [who are] humble toward the believers, powerful against the disbelievers; they strive in the cause of Allah and do not fear the blame of a critic. That is the favor of Allah ; He bestows it upon whom He wills. And Allah is all-Encompassing and Knowing.” [Al Maaidah 54]

The Western assault on Iran has begun

Posted: 2011/11/06

From: Source

Iran is already completely surrounded by US military.

HeyU Quality Ads

By Madison Ruppert

Just like Iraq, it begins with diplomatic and economic sanctions and open threats which eventually snowball into military action.

One can only hope that all of this saber rattling coming from Israel, the United States and the United Kingdom will not evolve into real military strikes.

However, the sweeping sanctions approved by the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives on Wednesday in the United States will still significantly damage Iran and its people if they are enacted.

While the sanctions that targeted the Iranian central bank and those who trade with Iran are now being reconsidered according to U.S. officials, the push from Israel might be able to force the hand of America even though it would harm American national interests.

Yet despite all of the posturing, there truly is no evidence that Iran is a threat to the West.

Even the Israeli news agency Haaretz has to point out this fact in writing, “Intelligence services now say it will take Iran two or three years to get the bomb once it decides to (it hasn’t made the decision yet).”

The most dangerous aspect of these types of sweeping sanctions is that the damage is not immediately apparent to the outside world and especially the West which has its information spoon-fed to it by highly biased corporate news sources.

For instance, the sanctions against Iraq which began in August of 1990, just four days after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, resulted in the deaths of an estimated 500,000 dead Iraqis, most of them children according to British MP George Galloway.

However, the Iraqi Baathist government estimated that 1.5 million died as a result of the sanctions and former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark estimated a total of 1.5 million died from sanctions, bombs and other weapons and depleted uranium (DU) poisoning.

It is clear that the damage from sanctions is not readily apparent and they usually do not end up harming those who they are intended to target in the government but instead end up harming regular people who have no impact on governmental operations or policies.

An article recently published by AntiWar reveals just how far-reaching these sanctions are and how damaging they could be for the people of Iran.

Some of these sanctions were radically unrealistic and harsh and as the president of the National Foreign Trade Council, Bill Reinsch pointed out, they “fly in the face of facts on the ground, the demonstrable failure of previous sanctions to achieve their stated purpose, and the basic rules of diplomacy among nations”.

Thankfully, it now appears that the U.S. is backing away from the sanctions which would target the Iranian central bank over concerns that it would negatively impact the already fragile international oil market.

That being said, U.S. officials are now saying that they will opt instead to seek to coerce Iranian’s major trading allies to join the United States in enforcing the sanctions that are already in place.

In addition, they are also reporting that the U.S. will create some more narrowly focused sanctions against Iran according to Paul Richter of the Los Angeles Times.

Meanwhile, across the pond, Britain and Israel seem to be gearing up for all-out war with Iran.

For the first time since 2008, Israel tested the Jericho 3, an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of carrying nuclear warhead long distances on Wednesday.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been reportedly trying to push what little opposition he has within his cabinet into getting behind an attack on Iran with the help of Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

In response to the Jericho 3 test, which was a clear instance of antagonizing Iran at an all-too-inopportune time, Barak said it was an “impressive technological achievement”.

In another suspiciously timed event, Israel released the details of an air force exercise done in concert with Italy, using a NATO base, over the Mediterranean Sea which simulated a long-distance strike, much like what would be utilized against Iran.

American President Barack Obama also said that he had spoken with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and they both had come to the conclusion “that international pressure must be maintained on Iran” according to Israeli news agency Haaretz.

A major factor in this push towards significant action against Iran is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report due next week.

This report will allegedly show if Iran is meeting its “international obligations” in its nuclear ambitions, although one might argue that this report could be highly biased given it is coming from a United Nations body.

Some American politicians are not being as coy as others, sticking to the typical diplomatic language in dealing with Iran.

Rick Perry, a former Bilderberg Group attendee, Republican Presidential hopeful and current Governor of Texas, has openly said he would support attacks on Iran.

“Obviously, we are going to support Israel. And I’ve said that we will support Israel in every way that we can, whether it’s diplomatic, whether it’s economic sanctions, whether it’s overt or covert operations, up to and including military action,” Perry said in an interview on CNN.

This kind of blind support for Israel is what plagues American politics today. Even when such a move could result in the death of Americans and/or a significant negative economic impact, politicians like Perry will happily back Israel to the detriment of our own nation.

The support within Israel for a strike on Iran is quite considerable as well with a Dialog Polling Institute poll showing that 41% of those polled backed an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

However, 39% of those polled oppose such an attack while 20% were undecided on the matter.

The margin of error was 4.6% and only 495 people were polled so one must consider the small sample size in giving credence to the figure. Dialog claims that their random sampling represents Israeli adults but the numbers are far from conclusive at this stage.

Despite the split in the Israeli public, the support for an attack on Iran amongst the Israeli cabinet does not seem so divided.

Haaretz reports that Israel’s Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, previously did not support an attack on Iran but was recently persuaded by Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Barak to get behind the move.

The Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister, Moshe Ya’alon, reportedly said that he would prefer an American military strike against Iran to an Israeli one.

Why would we have any interest in attacking Iran? In reality, Iran is not a threat to the United States but the Israel Lobby likely easily sway Washington into carrying out the strike for Israel, putting American lives and money on the line instead of their own.

Similarly, Dan Meridor, the Israeli Intelligence and Atomic Energy Minister said that he supports an American offensive against Iran.

The London Guardian has reported that Britain is developing military plans for an attack on Iran in preparation for the IAEA report which has been characterized as “a game changer”.

“The MoD [Ministry of Defense] says there are no hard and fast blueprints for conflict but insiders concede that preparations there and at the Foreign Office have been underway for some time”, according to The Guardian.

This dovetails with the reports of Obama planning to increase the American presence in the Persian Gulf, as previously reported.

It appears that the contingency plans have been in the works for some time and they are seemingly being implemented as I write this.

However, some are speculating that all of this public talk and open threats are just a covert push to pressure the international community into taking a hard line against Iran.

For instance, the former director of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Yossi Alpher, said that the discussion of air strikes against Iran “might be more to do with persuading the international community to tighten sanctions, which have so far proved ineffective, after the IAEA report is published next week”, according to The Week.

Meanwhile, in Iran, the reaction has been one of marked antagonism with the Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi saying that Iran is “ready for war” with Israel.

Salehi told the Turkish news outlet Hürriyet Daily, “We have been hearing threats from Israel for eight years. Our nation is a united nation…such threats are not new to us”.

Salehi also said that any attack would bring retaliation and Iranian General Hassan Firouzabadi said that Israel and the U.S. would be harshly punished for an attack in Iran.

“We would make them regret such a mistake and would severely punish them,” Firouzabadi said, adding, “In case of an attack by the Zionist regime, the United States would also be hit”.

The head of the Iranian Supreme National Security Council, Saeed Jalili, will reportedly detail the proof of U.S.-led terrorist plots against Iran at a ceremony marking the anniversary of the 1979 U.S. Embassy hostage crisis in Tehran.

This evidence is allegedly so damning that it could bring the U.S. government down according to an Iranian lawmaker and Deputy Chairman of the Majilis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy, Hossein Ebrahimi.

“Once Tehran publicizes the evidence in its possession on the US being a terrorist [state] and [Washington's] massacres, the American nation would certainly unite to topple their [ruling] regime”, Ebrahimi reportedly said.

Furthermore, in late September the head of the Iranian Navy, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari, threatened to send military ships off the Atlantic Coast of the United States.

About Quoriana

Visit Quoriana on twitter or at www.eccleza.net.

View all posts by Quoriana →

#

http://www.mathaba.net/support

The broadcasting of explicit footage of Muammar Gaddafi’s death was revolting, declared Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

“People within the journalistic community should realize what they are doing and bear moral responsibility for that,” Putin said at a session of the coordinating council of Russia’s Popular Front. “All the world TV channels showed this man, stained with blood, wounded but still alive and being clubbed to death – this is disgusting.”

The prime minister added that none of the world religions would approve of such a thing.

“I am not talking about the political aspect,” Putin stressed. “This is a separate topic – a civil war is underway there. But it’s not good that all this appears on the screens for millions of people, including children, to see.”

http://rt.com/politics/putin-media-gaddafi-death-819/

What the Libyan People do to Gaddafi’s dead body is contradicted to Islam.

When a dead body carried away by some men, Our prophet Muhammad immediately stand up to honor the dead.

Some of Muhammad’s friend say that the dead is infidel or a Jew.

Muhammad answerd, “Isn’t he a human too?”

So, regardless a Muslim or infidel, good or bad, a human dead body should be respected because human are sacred. Human are the noblest creatures from God.

We cannot humiliate a human body by displaying them in public until decay or use them as food for birds just because he is bad or infidel. We should respect them all.

Muhammad also said that if a human is dead, we should burry them immediately despite he/she is good or bad. If he/she is good, then we bring goodness to him/her. But if he/she is bad, then we remove the bad thing from ourselves.

Muhammad also said, “If one die, don’t mention anything except the good things. Don’t say bad things because it only hurt the livings”.

That is the Islamic teaching that we should follow.

Not barbaric things.

The protest start from September 17th, 2011 and on September 21, 2011 still keep going though some protesters have been arrested by the police.

Well you could see some of the videos here. Just visit:

occupywallst.org

Watch and spread them!

“Occupy Wall Street”: Thousands March in NYC Financial District, Set Up Protest Encampment


Roseanne Barr Speaks to Wall Street Protesters…#occupywallstreet..

Protesters ‘Occupy Wall Street’ for Third Day’

Wall Street closed as Protesters March … #occupywallstreet….

‘Occupy Wall Street’ – Seven Wall Street Protesters Arrested New York City Police

From: Democracy Now
September 19, 2011
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/9/19/occupy_wall_street_thousands_march_in
We’re going to go right now live to the protests. We’re joined on the phone by Nathan Schneider, editor at the website “Waging Nonviolence,” joining us several blocks from Wall Street.

Nathan, what’s happening as we broadcast now?

NATHAN SCHNEIDER: Actually, the protest is currently on Wall Street, coming up to the corner of William Street. There are probably a couple hundred people marching along the sidewalk behind police barricades, and they’ve been going up and down Broad for a few minutes, and now they’ve been led down Wall Street.

AMY GOODMAN: And their demands? And their demands, Nathan?

NATHAN SCHNEIDER: The demands have not been articulated in any concrete way. They’re carrying signs saying “Wall Street is our street,” “Hungry, eat a banker,” “Smash capitalism.” It’s a broad range of demands and slogans. But the general idea is that they’re fed up with what Wall Street has represented in this country, and they want a change.

AMY GOODMAN: And the police presence right now, already it’s intense throughout the city with the opening of the U.N. General Assembly, President Obama in town today. What about Wall Street now with the protesters?

NATHAN SCHNEIDER: The police presence has been strong, though mainly out of sight. During the night, the last couple of nights, there have been maybe 20, 25 police visible from the park where they’ve been sleeping. But there are police all around. And it’s clear that, if necessary, they could mobilize a large number at any time.

AMY GOODMAN: You slept overnight with the protesters in the park just above Wall Street. How many people were there? And what are they chanting as you’re talking to us now, Nathan?

NATHAN SCHNEIDER: The chants that they keep coming back to during these marches in the last few days is “All day, all week, occupy Wall Street.” I’d say about—maybe between 100 and 200 spent the night last night—it can be hard to tell sometimes—in sleeping bags, on newspaper, on cardboard. No tents.

AMY GOODMAN: Nathan, thanks for being with us. We’re going to be checking back with you through the day. Nathan Schneider, editor of the website “Waging Nonviolence.” When we come back from break, we’ll be joined by Dave Graeber, one of the people involved with this mass protest on Wall Street, author of Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Stay with us.
For the complete transcript, to download the podcast, or for information about Democracy Now!, visit http://www.democracynow.org

FOLLOW DEMOCRACY NOW! ONLINE:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/democracynow
Twitter: @democracynow
Subscribe on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/democracynow
Daily Email News Digest: http://www.democracynow.org/subscribe

Please consider supporting independent media by making a donation to Democracy Now!
today, visit http://www.democracynow.org/donate/YT
……………………………………………………………………..­……
Watch Live: http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution
Real-time results for occupy wall street: http://www.twazzup.com/?q=occupy+wall+street&l=all
Block the censorship, Promote #occupywallstreet:https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=292573430756348
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6687244/Democracy_Now_-_19_sep_2011

Our Mission

On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months.

Like our brothers and sisters in Egypt, Greece, Spain, and Iceland, we plan to use the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic of mass occupation to restore democracy in America. We also encourage the use of nonviolence to achieve our ends and maximize the safety of all participants.

Who is Occupy Wall Street?

Occupy Wall Street is leaderless resistance movement with people of many colors, genders and political persuasions. The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%.

The original call for this occupation was published by Adbusters in July; since then, many individuals across the country have stepped up to organize this event, such as the people of the NYC General Assembly and US Day of Rage. There’ll also be similar occupations in the near future such as October2011 in Freedom Plaza, Washington D.C.

https://occupywallst.org/

Nicolas Sarkozy

It seems the French people now already under the Jewish domination. The president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy is a jewish. So is with the presidential kandidate, Dominic Strauss Kahn. Both are Jewish.

So, where is the real French now? Could the real Frenchman become the president of France now?

Well, when I wrote about the Little Jewish Nicolas Sarkozy, I got banned in CNN discussion:

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/07/13/afghanistan.french.deaths/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

So much with the freedom of speech right?

From the News below, we will see that Jews such as Nicolas Sarkozy, Dominic Strauss Kahn, and Paul Wolfowitz have powerful position, money, and SEX SCANDALS…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Sarkozy

Nicolas Sarkozy admits Jewish ancestry
Share: by sankeur | October 27, 2010 at 11:51 am

394 views | 2 Recommendations | 2 comments
As if his marital challenges were not enough cause for concern, “Sarco the Sayan” has suddenly emerged as the most infamous accolade of French President Nicolas Sarkozy. The influential French daily Le Figaro last week revealed that the French leader once worked for — and perhaps still does, it hinted — Israeli intelligence as a sayan (Hebrew for helper), one of the thousands of Jewish citizens of countries other than Israel who cooperate with the katsas (Mossad case-officers).

Photos

A letter dispatched to French police officials late last winter — long before the presidential election but somehow kept secret — revealed that Sarkozy was recruited as an Israeli spy. The French police is currently investigating documents concerning Sarkozy’s alleged espionage activities on behalf of Mossad, which Le Figaro claims dated as far back as 1983. According to the author of the message, in 1978, Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin ordered the infiltration of the French ruling Gaullist Party, Union pour un Mouvement Populaire. Originally targeted were Patrick Balkany, Patrick Devedjian and Pierre Lellouche. In 1983, they recruited the “young and promising” Sarkozy, the “fourth man”.

Ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky describes how sayanim function in By Way Of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer. They are usually reached through relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in France, for instance, might be asked to draft a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organisation whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the Diaspora. Could the French relative help in any way? They perform many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental car agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could fund someone in the middle of the night if needs be, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police.

And, a political sayan ? It’s rather obvious what this could mean. The sayanim are a pool of people at the ready who will keep quiet about their actions out of loyalty to “the cause”, a non-risk recruitment system that draws from the millions of Jewish people outside Israel.

Such talk sends chills down spines, especially Arab and Muslim ones. Indeed, the revelation did not go unnoticed in Arab capitals or come as much of a surprise. Paris can be a sunny place for shady people. When it comes to intelligence gathering on behalf of Israel, a question mark is immediately raised on the moral calibre of the person in question. But, how does this scandal influence France’s foreign and domestic politics?

It is of symbolic significance that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was on a state visit to France in the immediate aftermath of Le Figaro ‘s exposé — ostensibly to discuss Iran’s nuclear agenda and the Palestinian question. Proud and prickly France under its supposedly savvy new president hopes to play a more prominent role in the perplexing world of Middle Eastern politics. On Monday, Sarkozy flew to Morocco, the ancestral home of many of France’s Jewry, soon after his Mossad connection was made public. There is no clear evidence that the revelation is to make France any more unpopular in the Arab world than it already is, especially not in official circles.

On the domestic front, however, there are many conflicting considerations. The Jews of France now display a touch of the vapours, in sharp contrast to the conceited triumphalism with which they greeted his election: “we are persuaded that the new president will continue eradicating anti-Israeli resistance,” Sammy Ghozlan, president of the Jewish Community of Paris pontificated soon after Sarkozy’s election. France is home to 500,000 Jews, mostly Sephardic Jews originally from North Africa and Mediterranean countries.

Sarkozy’s own maternal grandfather Aron Mallah, hailed from Salonika, Greece, and is said to have exercised considerable influence on his grandson. Even though raised as a Roman Catholic, “Sarkozy played a critical role in moving the French government to do what is necessary to address the ill winds that threaten the largest Jewish community in Western Europe,” noted David Harris, the executive director of the American Jewish Committee. Sarkozy, after all, was a political product of the predominantly Jewish elite neighbourhood of Neuilly-sur-Seine, where he long served as mayor.

France’s Muslim minority was far from surprised by Le Figaro ‘s revelations, even though some may have feigned disappointment. Others have been more forthright. “France is not run by Frenchmen, but by lackeys of the Zionist International who control the economy,” lamented Radio Islam, of militant Islamist tendencies. When Sarkozy was France’s minister of interior and clamped down hard on Muslim immigrants, calling mainly Muslim rioters “scum” in a widely-publicised interview, they retaliated by calling him “Sarkozy, sale juif [dirty Jew]“. Obviously there is no love lost between the five million-strong French Muslim community, the largest in Western Europe, and the French president. He has grounds for concern. He assiduously courts the Israelis. That much is known.

In the scientific annals of French politics there is a cautionary tale of pantomime. French presidents are not always what they seem. There are, however, two key observations concerning Sarkozy. One, is Sarkozy’s intention of implementing a “new social contract” between employers and employees, capital and labour. This smacks of Thatcherism. His determination to force a “cultural revolution” in the collective national psyche is a trifle farcical. And unprincipled to boot. He recently introduced legislation — in tandem with his pension cuts, calling for genetic profiling of immigrants to ensure any relatives intending to immigrate are linked genetically. The strategy appears to be to soften the blow of the social security cuts by appealing to xenophobic racism.

The state of race relations in France is an even more muddled picture than the devastating caricatures by French-African comedian Dieudonne suggest. He is notorious for playing the part of a Hassidic Jew who mimics the Nazi salute. Few politicians blame their troubles on cynical comedians, though, and Sarkozy is no exception. His fans point accusing fingers at the “irresponsible press”.

The real magic starts when you power Sarkozy with his ex-model wife. She, after all, played a part in the freeing of the Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian medical doctor. She, too, is of Spanish-Jewish ancestry. But, that may be nothing but an insignificant aside. France, generally, regarded their bust-up as something of a bad joke. Unlike the Americans, the French do not take the private lives of their presidents terribly seriously. There was the late François Mitterrand, for example. Hardly anyone in all France raised an eyebrow when it transpired that he had an illegitimate daughter. The French are more concerned with the ideological orientation and political affiliation of their president and are not in the least interested in their private affairs — at least not in any political sense.

The interesting twist, however, is that the contest between Cecilia and Nicolas Sarkozy is a comic cross between a lover’s tiff and the battle of the sexes. It appears befuddled French voters are being forced to turn a blind eye to their leaders’ antics. Sarkozy’s divorce follows hard on the heels of the separation of France’s first female presidential candidate Ségolène Royal, the “gazelle” of French politics, from her lifelong lover François Hollande barely a month after she lost the presidential race in May. Moreover, at the tender age of 19, Royal sued her father for his refusal to divorce her mother and pay alimony and child support. That was way back in 1972; barely a decade later she won the case against her father. Ironically, Royal’s own mentor the late French socialist president Mitterrand was notorious for his extra-marital affairs, the most conspicuous being his love affair with Anne Pingeot and subsequent disclosure towards the end of his life that he fathered an illegitimate daughter Mazarine with her.

And, what of the voters? The latest hazard facing the French president has been his socio-economic policies. Sarkozy’s showdown with the trade unions threatens to turn into a deciding moment for France. Foreign policy, too, has come under much scrutiny. France has become fanatically Atlanticist under the presidency of Sarkozy. Although, unlike US President George W Bush, Sarkozy does not make much noise about his own dubious religious convictions. The commonest criticism of Sarkozy is that he is overly conscious of his religious heritage, a trait that is not appreciated by the fanatically secular French political establishment. France is culturally the most irreligious country in Europe, itself the most secular and anti-religious of the world’s continents.

For a politician acclaimed for his acumen, it is startling that Sarkozy has been tripped up by events he should have seen coming. His sagacity obviously failed him this week. Le Figaro let the cat out of the bag. And his wife, too, after shopping with Lyudmila Putin, the Russian first lady, apparently decided that she had had enough of being treated as “part of the furniture” and made their rift very public.

France is now in the awkward position of having no first lady. The 49 year- old former model, lawyer and political advisor is by no means media shy. “I gave Nicolas 20 years of my life,” she told the popular French magazine Elle in a special feature which she asked for personally, despite the awkwardness of its timing. She had long complained of being politically peripheralised. Troubling as that interpretation is, it is in a way a consoling one for Sarkozy. He is now free to handle his opponents without his maverick Cecilia breathing down his neck or, on the contrary, disappearing at crucial moments.

Even with his personal life in tatters, Sarkozy is obliged to hoist the French tricoleur high in the international arena. Which flag is it to be?

Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Nicolas Sarkozy admits Jewish ancestry | NowPublic News Coverage http://www.nowpublic.com/world/nicolas-sarkozy-admits-jewish-ancestry

Exposing The Bacon
Eating Atheist Jew
By Curt Maynard
5-15-7
I recently became aware of a Jewish Internet agent provocateur going by the moniker “bacon-eating atheist Jew.” It seems he didn’t like a particular article I wrote a week ago entitled “Let’s Talk about Jews and Elections.”[1] I wonder why? Why would a professed ‘atheist’ care whether or not I wrote about Jews, isn’t Judaism a religion and not a race or ethnicity? Isn’t that what we’ve all been led to believe? Besides, what does he have against dialogue? Why is it that the ‘bacon-eating atheist Jew’ doesn’t want us to “talk” about Jews and elections?

In any case, I’d like to tear apart his argument and expose him for the fool and black propagandist he truly is. Here goes.

In my article, Let’s Talk About Jews And Elections, I exposed the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s new President, is a Jew. The bacon-eating atheist Jew suggests he’s a Catholic. You decide [See photo above - note yarmulke].

In his critique of my article[2] the bacon-eating atheist Jew suggests that Sarkozy isn’t Jewish that he’s a practicing Catholic:

“His grandfather, a Sephardi Jew by birth, was a convert to Catholicism, and Sarkozy was, accordingly, raised in the Catholic faith of his household. Nicolas Sarkozy, like his brothers, is a baptised and professing Catholic.”

This is a bald-faced LIE and the bacon-eating atheist Jew is a liar. He knows very well that Sarkozy is Jewish, he was born of a Jewish womb, Sarkozy’s mother is a Jew, therefore by Jewish LAW, so is Sarkozy. PERIOD. He could be a practicing Buddhist and it wouldn’t matter, his mother is a Jew, therefore he is, too. In effect, what we have is a poor Internet propagandist, the BEAJ on one side insisting Sarkozy is a Catholic…and on the other side, we have some prestigious Jewish publications acknowledging the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy is as Jewish as matzo balls.

The Australian Jewish news[3] reports the following:

“it is well known that Sarkozy’s mother was born to the Mallah family, one of the oldest Jewish families of Salonika, Greece.”

The AJN additionally quotes Sarkozy himself stating the following which clearly illustrates that the new French President recognizes his Jewishness:

“In an interview Nicolas Sarkozy gave in 2004, he expressed an extraordinary understanding of the plight of the Jewish people for a home: “Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as a second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel.”

The AJN isn’t the only publication to confirm that Sarkozy is a Jew. The UK’s Guardian confirms it,[4] as does the Israeli National News,[5] the Jewish Telegraph Agency,[6] the Jewish Journal,[7] and the European Jewish News, here[8] and here.[9]

The Guardian even published an article entitled “The tough, new president still loves his mum, France’s real first lady,”[10] now if that doesn’t convince even the greatest skeptic that Nicolas is a “good Jewish boy,” I don’t know what will.

In short, the bacon-eating atheist Jew is a liar, he knows very well that Nicolas Sarkozy is a Jew and the only reason he posted a critique of my article was on the off chance that a few ignorant Gentiles might read it.[11]

The BEAJ hates white people. It’s obvious, all one need do is read the man’s words. In his Judeophobe[12] critique of my article he refers to whites as “whitey,” and states the following:

“Any hoot, I’m sure you are now dumbfounded because by your own logic, you figured out that Joooos are the majority if include [sic] people like Sarkozy and Kerry. That is why you guys aren’t in control, you dumb ass WHITEYS are the minority.”

Of course, the BEAJ wants his Gentile readers to believe that when he uses the word “whitey,” he is only referring to ‘racist’ whites, but we really have no reason to believe him. He is after all a proven liar [see above].

Of the greatest interest, at least to me, is the BEAJ’s comments concerning the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. He reiterates the boringly predictable denunciation of the Protocols, you know the one, they’re fake, a fraud, a forgery, etc. Of course, he doesn’t provide a link to them as I did in my article and am once again doing now [See the actual text of the Protocols of Zion here].[13] The Protocols were allegedly proven a fraud after a trial in Berne, Switzerland back in 1934. I’d remind Gentile readers that a well- publicized trial also found O.J. Simpson innocent of murder, despite the fact that he was obviously guilty. I’d remind readers that most recently a Jewish judge, Jewish prosecutor and Jewish Medical Examiner also allegedly found no evidence that Anna Nicole Smith’s Jewish husband, Howard Stern, murdered her and her son, despite the fact that even the dullest Fox News viewer isn’t very convinced of Stern’s alleged innocence. In reality, trials mean very little, especially when a Jewish media is reporting on them, as they did after the 1934 Berne Protocols case. This hasn’t changed much over the last 73 years, i.e. Iraq and WMD.

As far as the BEAJ’s assertion that the Protocols are fake, but his unwillingness to provide a link to them, consider these words written more than 50 years ago:

“The claim of the Jews that the Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their genuineness, for they [Jews] NEVER ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE FACTS corresponding to the THREATS which the Protocols contain, and, indeed, the correspondence between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This, the Jews well know and therefore evade.”[14]

BEAJ apparently accepts the fact that Jews are disproportionately represented in the fields I mentioned in my article as he utilizes the same by now predictable and dogmatic response:

“The bottom line is that Joooos are generally better-educated and usually wind up with white collar jobs. Joooos don’t prevent WHITEY from doing the same thing. The West is about capitalism, and whatever Jooooish entertainers, Jooooish politicians?, and media moguls do must be liked by the overwhelming majority of the population, or they’d be out of business.”

Of course, I disagree with him. In fact, when I wrote the article, I accurately predicted some critic would emerge with the BEAJ’s argument, that’s why I included the following in my article:

“All of us have been thoroughly indoctrinated with the idea that Jews are indeed special and highly ambitious and this is supposed to explain their large showings in politics, academia, the sciences, the media, etc. I personally think it far more likely that a Jewish stranglehold on OUR media better explains these discrepancies, I am not particularly impressed by their alleged abilities, after all, look around you; is the world really a better place with Jews at the helm?”

In short, the BEAJ does nothing but reinforce my argument that many Jews, not necessarily Zionists alone, are part and parcel of a growing problem in the west. Most of them tend to collaborate with criminal and Talmudic Jews, which makes them complicit. As I have said over and over, it is *organized* Jewry, which include propagandists like the BEAJ that seek to silence criticism by way of hate crime/hate speech legislation. I can’t tell you how often I am lambasted by Jews for writing about this, but nonetheless it’s a fact. I wrote about this in “Let’s Talk about Jews and Elections” when I penned the following:

“In the beginning of this article, I noted the fact that France now has a Jewish President. I did this solely to point out in the end, that this phenomenon is not isolated to America, it has plagued Europe for decades and is the real reason Europe has passed draconian “hate crime” and “hate speech” legislation which has resulted in the imprisonment of thousands of European patriots. Jewish politicians are the primary force behind the passage of these laws, just as they are in the United States. These Jews hide behind the cloak of other minorities by using them as if they were the crux of concern, but in fact, these laws are designed for no other reason than to prevent exposure and criticism of ethnic Jews and their Supremacist policies/agenda.”[15]

The fact of the matter is, JEWS are behind pushing “hate crime” legislation through Congress and they will pull out all stops in their effort to rearrange the Constitution to fit their needs.

The largest Jewish publication in the world, The Forward, reinforces this fact with this recent article entitled “Jewish Groups Set To Fight Veto of Hate-Crimes Bill.”[16] In it, the attentive reader will find the following:

“Jewish organizations are playing a leading role in the coalition pushing the bill, with almost all of them – except the Orthodox ones – taking action to promote the passage of the measure. The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crime Prevention Act of 2007 passed the House floor last week, in a 237-180 vote. The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to begin debating the bill within two weeks.”[17]

So there you have it – not from an alleged anti-Semite, but from the world’s largest Jewish publication, The Forward.

Lastly, lest you still sympathize with these people and in order to reinforce what kind of person the bacon-eating atheist Jew really is, consider what he and his compatriots wrote to and about a 14- year old girl, Stefania Glenn, the daughter of Mark Glenn:

“You’re the ugly one, you sicialian wop whore. You’re people are related to Arabs. Hell, you married an Arab. What is Marc Glenns REAL last name. You’re a Papist whore. Go back to North Africa and take your swarthy southern italian mafia with you’[18]

Or this one from the atheist Jew himself:[19]

“‘You really are a stupid freak. You are a common retard. You have no argument. Nothing but an imbecile. You have an inferior complex, maybe because you are an Arab, I don’t know. Fuck off and die. You have kids. Hopefully they didn’t inherit your self loathing and inferiority and low IQ. If they did they did and think like you, they should have been aborted. You are a sad sad twerp’

Benevolent and altruistic people, no?

Wake up America; you’re being taken for a ride.

http://pcapostate.blogspot.com/2007/05/exposing-bacon-eating-atheist-jew.html

http://www.rense.com/general76/aj.htm

France questions itself over Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s ‘open secret’

Less than three weeks ago, Dominique Strauss-Kahn sat down in a Paris restaurant for an off-the-record lunch with two journalists from the daily Libération. The IMF chief outlined the three biggest personal hurdles in his relentless campaign to become president of France: “Money, women and being a Jew.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/16/dominique-strauss-khan-arrest-france

How Jewish is Dominique Strauss-Kahn?

Sacre bleu – according to our team of halachic researchers, Strauss-Kahn is half-Ashkenazi, half-Sephardi, but completely Jewish by birth. He has associated himself with the fight against antisemitism – he was MP for Sarcelles, an area with France’s highest density of Jews, and said: “Antisemitism in our country is growing and it would be wrong not to see it.” His wife, Ann Sinclair, is also Jewish. Strauss-Kahn follows in a tradition of Jewish bosses of international financial institutions becoming embroiled in scandal… No, stop, we’re really not going to go there. Not helpful to the Jews. So we won’t even mention the trouble Paul Wolfowitz had at the World Bank last year.

http://www.thejc.com/dominique-strauss-kahn/7260/how-jewish-dominique-strauss-kahn

Arab Saudi Commander with US Commander

A well-known Saudi prince, Prince Turki al-Faisal, said  to senior US and British military leaders that Saudi Arabia will be forced to acquire nuclear weapons of Iran does so, according to a report in Britain’s Guardian newspaper.

Well it’s a pitty of Saudi Arabia want to get nuclear weapon just to fight Iran. Not Israel.
Saudi Arabia also gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites. Is Saudi Arabia now an Israelis’ Dog? Instead of fighting the Jews that occupied Palestine and Masjidil Aqsa, fighting other Muslims and defending Israel?

Saudi Arabia (together with other Arab Nation, US and Europe) has supported Saddam Hussein to attack Iran in Iran-Iraq War. In that war, 2 million Muslims have died.

An Arab Saudi soldier jokes with a US soldier

Why Saudi Arabia wage war against other Muslims instead of Israel? If 1/10 from the 2 million Muslims that died in Iran-Iraq war used to fight Israel, Masjidil Aqsa will be in the hand of Islam now.

The Christians (US and Europe) slaughter millions of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Jews slaughtered millions of Muslims in Palestine. Allah has warned Muslims against the Jews and the Christians:

“The path of those whom Thou hast favoured. Not (the path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray.” [Al Fatihah 7]

“And the Jews will not be pleased with thee, nor will the Christians, till thou follow their creed. Say: Lo! the guidance of Allah (Himself) is Guidance. And if thou shouldst follow their desires after the knowledge which hath come unto thee, then wouldst thou have from Allah no protecting friend nor helper.” [Al Baqarah 120]

A US commander brief Arab Saudi soldiers

So, why the King and the Princes (such as Prince Turki al-Faisal) make friend with the Jews and the Christians and kill other Muslims?

http://muslimjournalist.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/saudi-arabiawill-get-nuclear-if-iran-have-one/

Prince Turki al-Faisal was a former Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States. A Jewish Dog?

June 12, 2010
Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites
Hugh Tomlinson
For full coverage, pictures and video from the Middle East, try our new website

Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran.

To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return to full alert.

“The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,” said a US defence source in the area. “They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren’t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.”

Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,” said one.

The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete.

The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers’ range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest.

Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an effort to halt the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme, which Tehran claims is intended for civil energy purposes only. President Ahmadinejad has described the UN resolution as “a used handkerchief, which should be thrown in the dustbin”.

Israeli officials refused to comment yesterday on details for a raid on Iran, which the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has refused to rule out. Questioned on the option of a Saudi flight path for Israeli bombers, Aharaon Zeevi Farkash, who headed military intelligence until 2006 and has been involved in war games simulating a strike on Iran, said: “I know that Saudi Arabia is even more afraid than Israel of an Iranian nuclear capacity.”

In 2007 Israel was reported to have used Turkish air space to attack a suspected nuclear reactor being built by Iran’s main regional ally, Syria. Although Turkey publicly protested against the “violation” of its air space, it is thought to have turned a blind eye in what many saw as a dry run for a strike on Iran’s far more substantial — and better-defended — nuclear sites.

Israeli intelligence experts say that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are at least as worried as themselves and the West about an Iranian nuclear arsenal.Israel has sent missile-class warships and at least one submarine capable of launching a nuclear warhead through the Suez Canal for deployment in the Red Sea within the past year, as both a warning to Iran and in anticipation of a possible strike. Israeli newspapers reported last year that high-ranking officials, including the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have met their Saudi Arabian counterparts to discuss the Iranian issue. It was also reported that Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, met Saudi intelligence officials last year to gain assurances that Riyadh would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets violating Saudi airspace during the bombing run. Both governments have denied the reports.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7148555.ece

Riyadh will build nuclear weapons if Iran gets them, Saudi prince warns
Prospect of a nuclear conflict in the Middle East is raised by senior diplomat and member of the Saudi ruling family

Share
3339
reddit this
Jason Burke in Riyadh
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 29 June 2011 17.19 BST
Article history

Prince Turki al-Faisal: he said that if Iran came close to developing nuclear weapons Riyadh would not stand idly by. Photograph: Hassan Ammar/AFP/Getty Images
A senior Saudi Arabian diplomat and member of the ruling royal family has raised the spectre of nuclear conflict in the Middle East if Iran comes close to developing a nuclear weapon.

Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former Saudi intelligence chief and ambassador to Washington, warned senior Nato military officials that the existence of such a device “would compel Saudi Arabia … to pursue policies which could lead to untold and possibly dramatic consequences”.

He did not state explicitly what these policies would be, but a senior official in Riyadh who is close to the prince said yesterday his message was clear.

“We cannot live in a situation where Iran has nuclear weapons and we don’t. It’s as simple as that,” the official said. “If Iran develops a nuclear weapon, that will be unacceptable to us and we will have to follow suit.”

Officials in Riyadh said that Saudi Arabia would reluctantly push ahead with its own civilian nuclear programme. Peaceful use of nuclear power, Turki said, was the right of all nations.

Turki was speaking earlier this month at an unpublicised meeting at RAF Molesworth, the airbase in Cambridgeshire used by Nato as a centre for gathering and collating intelligence on the Middle East and the Mediterranean.

According to a transcript of his speech obtained by the Guardian, Turki told his audience that Iran was a “paper tiger with steel claws” that was “meddling and destabilising” across the region.

“Iran … is very sensitive about other countries meddling in its affairs. But it should treat others like it expects to be treated. The kingdom expects Iran to practise what it preaches,” Turki said.

Turki holds no official post in Saudi Arabia but is seen as an ambassador at large for the kingdom and a potential future foreign minister,

Diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks and published by the Guardian last year revealed that King Abdullah, who has ruled Saudi Arabia since 2005, had privately warned Washington in 2008 that if Iran developed nuclear weapons “everyone in the region would do the same, including Saudi Arabia”.

Saudi Arabian diplomats and officials have launched a serious campaign in recent weeks to rally global and regional powers against Iran, fearful that their country’s larger but poorer regional rival is exploiting the Arab Spring to gain influence in the region and within the kingdom itself.

Turki also accused Iran of interfering in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and in the Gulf state of Bahrain, where Saudi troops were deployed this year as part of a Gulf Co-operation Council force following widespread protests from those calling for greater democratic rights.

Though there has previously been little public comment from Riyadh on developments in Syria, Turki told his audience at Molesworth that President Bashar al-Assad “will cling to power till the last Syrian is killed”.

Syria presents a dilemma for Saudi policymakers: although they would prefer not to see popular protest unseat another regime in the region, they view the Damascus regime, which is dominated by members of Syria’s Shia minority, as a proxy for Iran.

“The loss of life [in Syria] in the present internal struggle is deplorable. The government is woefully deficient in its handling of the situation,” Turki said at the Molesworth meeting, which took place on 8 June.

Though analysts say demonstrations in Bahrain were not sectarian in nature, two senior Saudi officials in Riyadh said this week that Tehran had mobilised the largely Shia protesters against the Sunni rulers of the Gulf state. Iran has a predominantly Shia population. Around 15% of Saudis are Shia. The officials described this minority, which suffers extensive discrimination despite recent attempts at reform, as “vulnerable to external influence”.

Though there has been negligible unrest internally, Saudi Arabia has been shaken by the events across the Arab world in recent months and has watched anxiously as a number of allies – such as President Hosni Mubarak – have been ousted or have found themselves in grave difficulties. President Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen is being treated in a Saudi Arabian hospital for wounds caused by a mysterious blast that forced him to leave his country this month.

The former Tunisian ruler Zine al-Abedine ben Ali, whose relations with Riyadh were complex, is reported to have been housed in a luxurious villa in the Red Sea port city of Jeddah after he fled his homeland for Saudi Arabia.

Saudi officials admitted that decision-makers in Saudi Arabia were “not keen” on demonstrators ousting governments, but said they were “even less keen on killing and massacres”.

Turki also warned that al-Qaida has been able to create “a sanctuary not unlike Pakistan’s tribal areas” in Yemen.

Saudi Arabian foreign policy historically has been pro-western, although differences have emerged with the United States in recent years. The Arab Spring has also caused some tension, with the deployment of troops in Bahrain opposed by Washington.

There has also been conflict following western charges that the kingdom has exported radical strands of Islam around the Muslim world.Turki said that “in all areas, Islam must play a central yet development role” and insisted that “closer monitoring” now ensured that funds raised in the kingdom “were not misused”.

Internally, Saudi Arabia faced problems because of the youthfulness of its population, radicalism and different sectarian identities, Turki said.

Senior officials at the ministry of interior in Riyadh said that Iran was using ideology to “penetrate” the Arabian peninsula “in the same way al-Qaida did”.

Turki also reiterated a long-standing Saudi call for a nuclear free zone in the Middle East, which would include both Iran and Israel and would be enforced by the United Nations security council.

The prince said sanctions against Iran were working. He welcomed the consensus in Washington that military strikes against Tehran would be counterproductive.

Analysts said that Turki’s words about developing nuclear arms may have been intended to focus western attention on Saudi concerns about their regional rival rather than to indicate any kind of definite decision by Riyadh because the practical and diplomatic obstacles of doing so would be immense.

William Hague, Britain’s foreign secretary said that Iran has recently conducted covert tests of ballistic missiles as well as at least three secret tests of medium-range ballistic missiles since October.

Iran and the west remain in dispute over its nuclear programme. The US and its allies insist Tehran aims to develop atomic weapons, a charge that Iran rejects.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/29/saudi-build-nuclear-weapons-iran

SAUDI PRINCE WARNS IRAN ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS. By Ray Moseley
Thursday, 30 June 2011

Prince Turki al-Faisal was a former Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States. (File photo)

By RAY MOSELEY
AL ARABIYA LONDON
A well-known Saudi prince has given a broad hint to senior US and British military leaders that Saudi Arabia will be forced to acquire nuclear weapons of Iran does so, according to a report in Britain’s Guardian newspaper.

Prince Turki al-Faisal, believed to be a prospective foreign minister, made the disclosure at a closed meeting held at RAF Molesworth, one of three British bases used by American forces since World War II. It is now a NATO intelligence center dealing with the Mediterranean and Middle East.

“Iran (developing) a nuclear weapon would compel Saudi Arabia…to pursue policies which could lead to untold and possibly dramatic consequences,” the prince was quoted as saying.

“If they successfully pursue a military program, we will have to follow suit.”

Guardian correspondent Jason Burke said he did not specifically say Saudi Arabia would acquire nuclear weapons of Iran does. But he quoted a senior Saudi adviser as telling the Guardian it would be “inconceivable that there would be a day when Iran had a nuclear weapon and Saudi Arabia did not.”

The report lends weight to a WikiLeaks disclosure last year of diplomatic cables stating that Saudi King Abdullah privately warned Washington in 2008 that if Iran developed nuclear weapons, “everyone in the region would do the same, including Saudi Arabia.”

A former intelligence chief and former ambassador to Washington, Prince Turki was reported to have called the loss of life in Syria during the current uprising against President Bashar Al Assad as “deplorable.”

“The government is woefully deficient in its handling of the situation,” he said, but added that President Assad “will cling to power till the last Syrian is killed.”

The Guardian said Saudi officials in Riyadh were “not keen” on demonstrators ousting governments, but “even less keen on killing and massacres.”

The Guardian said it had obtained a transcript of Prince Turki’s speech, in which he warned that military strikes to prevent Iran from producing nuclear weapons would be “counterproductive.” He said sanctions against the Tehran regime were working.

The prince was reported to have said that an alternative to military strikes would be to “squeeze” Iran’s profits from oil, something the Saudis could do with their spare pumping capacity.

The newspaper said Saudi Arabia is reported to have an “option” on acquiring Pakistan’s nuclear capability, in event of Iran getting the bomb, in return for Saudi financing of Pakistan for several decades.

Prince Faisal was reported to have made clear that Saudi Arabia was using its vast oil wealth to minimize potential ill-will toward Riyadh among populations whose authoritarian rulers have been backed by Saudi Arabia.

It has spent $2.5 billion since 2006 in Lebanon to counter Syrian influence and the Shia Hezbollah movement, and Prince Turki said several billion more will go to Palestinians. Saudi Arabia also has offered $4 billion in aid to Egypt. He said that stands “in stark comparison to the conditional loans that the US and Europe have promised.”

Before his downfall, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak enjoyed strong support from Saudi Arabia.

Prince Turki was reported to have reiterated a long-standing Saudi appeal for a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East, embracing Iran and Israel and enforced by the United Nations Security Council.

He also touched on the troubles in Yemen and said that country’s more remote tribal areas had become a safe haven for terrorism comparable to Pakistan’s tribal areas.

(Ray Moseley is a London-based former chief European correspondent of the Chicago Tribune and has worked extensively in the Middle East. He can be reached at rnmoseley@aol.com.)

http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/30/155487.html

BANK OF ENGLAND

BANK OF IRELAND

BANK OF FRANCE

BANK OF GERMANY

The Federal Reserve of US

…

ALL OF THEM

ARE NOT OWNED BY THEIR PEOPLES GOVERNMENTS

THEY ARE PRIVATE AND THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN IN LAW THE RIGHT TO PRINT PAPAER CURRENCY ON BEHALF OF THE RESPECTIVE GVERNMENTS AS LOANS TO THOSE GOVERNMETNS AT INTEREST

A DEBT IN OTHER WORDS

THIS IS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY

HIDDEN FROM PEOPLE YET PLAINLY PUBLISHED

THE WHOLE WORLDS NATIONS ARE BEING TREATED AS SLAVES TO A SET OF PRIVATE BANKS OVER GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE LOTTING THE PEOPLES OF THE FREE WORLD

IT IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

THESE BANKS JUST PRINT AND GET RICH WHILE THE PEOPLE ARE ENSLAVED AND PUT IN DEBT.

SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE

HERE IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE

THE BANK OF ENGLAND

Who Owns The Bank Of England?

You ask that question to one thousand Britons, and I kid you not, all of them will say that it is owned by the Government. They would be wrong.

The Bank Of England was originally a private bank, which contracted to lend money to the British Government in a financial crisis. It was privately owned at its foundation and remained so until the post-war Labour government nationalised it in 1946.

So it is owned by the government?

No.

Here is how Wikipedia explains it.

In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”

Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.

In other words, you and I are not allowed to know who the shareholders are who own the company which carries out Central Banking in the UK. Some people say that Mandelson’s buddies, the Rothschilds are major shareholders. Also the Queen. But the information is secret. We are not allowed to know.

But what would surprise everybody is that the Bank Of England, which is entitled to issue cash, then lend it and charge interest to the government, is still essentially a private business.

What would also surprise people is so is the Federal Reserve of America a [privately owned bank, and all central banks of the world, including the Bank Of International Settlements in Switzerland, which is the Central Banks’ clearing house.

If the One World Government actually had an address, this would be part of it – the B.I.S, another privately owned bank, the central bankers’ central bank, beyond the control of democracy or government, able to influence events secretly from behind the scenes. One thing is for sure is that in times of financial crisis, these central banking networks become supremely powerful, as those like Gordon Brown allow their countries to become effectively indebted to the point of loss of control.

The people wielding this power see the world’s financial crisis as their moment of opportunity to seize greater power. The scary part of that is that hardly a living soul even knows they exist. Now that’s real power.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000190924594#!/home.php?sk=group_211472302198942&notif_t=group_activity

Well, the president of the United States, Barack Obama, has officially announced Osama bin Laden has been killed by U.S. forces. The biggest scary terrorist in the world now is already dead.

The New York Time said: The news touched off an extraordinary outpouring of emotion as crowds gathered outside the White House, in Times Square and at the Ground Zero site, waving American flags, cheering, shouting, laughing and chanting, “U.S.A., U.S.A.!”

In order to kill the terrorist who kill 3,000 victims in 9/11, George W Bush send thousands of troops into 2 countries: Afghanistan and Iraq. More than 50 million people there have to be living in the war zone. They barely can work. Even they can get bombs that dropped by US Air Force or missiles from flying drones.

Every year 2,700 people died in Afghanistan during US invasion for 10 years.
While in Iraq 151,000 people died.

Now Bin Laden is dead.
Will the US send their troops back from Afghanistan and Iraq to their home in 2-3 weeks or even in 2-3 years to let the Afghan and Iraqis to do their own business?

I don’t think so.

The main reason of Afghanistan and Iraq invasion is to get the oil fields there so the Rockefellers’ oil firms could have more oil fields. They could get more monopoly so they could set the oil price as high as they can.

Another reason is the Loan Shark legend: The Rothschilds could give loan to US government to finance the wars. Currently US public debt is more than US$ 14 trillion. The Rothschilds at least enjoy US$ 14 trillion as interest for long term loan (e.g. Afghanistan war has been 10 years now since 2001). Previously, The Rothschilds gain an enormous fortune for financing British and its allies in Napoleonic War against France (Wikipedia).

The British had to borrow money from the Rothschilds to finance the war.

When the France destroyed, the France also need money (with big interest of course) from the Rothschilds to finance their economic recovery.

Mayer and his sons eventually became bankers to whom the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars of 1792–1815 came as a piece of great good fortune.  The wars, for the Rothschilds, meant loans to warring princes (Encyclopaedia Britannica).

The US people should pay the loan with their tax that is getting higher and higher and buying their daily needs with higher prices. Thousands of soldiers have to die for that.

Now Bin Laden is dead.

US government have to create a brand new terrorist to fight. They should have a new terrorist to maintain the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and create new wars such as in Libya. This new terrorist should be more horrible, more savage, more hated than Osama bin Laden. Who will that be?

Nizami

http://muslimjournalist.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-is-dead-who-will-be-the-new-terrorists-now

References:
9/11: 3,000 victims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

Afghanistan Invasion: around 27,000 victims (2,700 victims every year) http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2011/03/2011391229382651.html

Iraq Invasion: 151,000 victims

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/02/world/asia/osama-bin-laden-is-killed.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/510613/Rothschild-family/6264/Mayers-five-sons

In France you could get naked or showing your breast or thigh or anything that against God’s order without being punished. But once you try to apply the Islamic Teaching, the France Government will ban and fine you.

So, the Islamic Country that allow Muslims to practice Islamic teaching should be build to replace the Infidel country that apply the Zionist Jews and Christians system.

There is no freedom religion for Islam. And that is the truth!

France — home to Europe’s biggest Muslim population — on Monday officially banned women from wearing full-face veils in public places.

Other European countries have drawn up bans on the burqa and the niqab but France is the first to risk stirring social tensions by putting one into practice.

The law comes into effect at an already fraught moment in relations between the state and France’s Muslim minority, with President Nicolas Sarkozy accused of stigmatising Islam to win back votes from a resurgent far right.

French officials estimate that only around 2,000 women, from a total Muslim population estimated at between four and six million, wear the full-face veils that are traditional in parts of Arabia and South Asia.

But many Muslims and rights watchdogs accuse the rightwing president of targeting one of France’s most vulnerable groups to signal to anti-immigration voters that he shares their fear that Islam is a threat to French culture.

Police on Saturday said they arrested 59 people, including 19 veiled women, who turned up for a banned protest in Paris over the ban, while two more were detained as they attempted to travel to the rally from Britain and Belgium.

Some critics worry the law may be hard to enforce, since it had to be drawn up without reference to religion to ban any kind of face covering in public and since police officers will not be allowed to remove women’s head coverings.

Anyone refusing to lift his or her veil to submit to an identity check can be taken to a police station. There, officers must try to persuade them to remove the garment, and can threaten fines.

A woman who repeatedly insists on appearing veiled in public can be fined 150 euros (216 dollars) and ordered to attend re-education classes.

There are much more severe penalties for anyone found guilty of forcing someone else to hide his or her face “through threats, violence, constraint, abuse of authority or power for reason of their gender.”

Clearly aimed at fathers, husbands or religious leaders who force women to wear face-veils, and applicable to offences committed in public or in private, the law imposes a fine of 30,000 euros and a year in jail.

Foreign extremists, including fugitive Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden have used the ban to argue France is at war with Islam, and have called for attacks.

Belgium’s parliament has approved a similar law, but has yet to enforce it. In the Netherlands far-right leaders have proposed a ban, and in Italy the right-wing Northern League is lobbying for a ban on the French model.

It is hard to gauge the mood of the bulk of veil wearing French Muslim women, but two who agreed to speak to AFP — who gave their names as Aya and Umm Isra — said they would not challenge the ban in the street.

But, they added, if they can’t wear their niqabs they will likely go out far less often, suggesting the ban could create a hidden underclass.

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/france-bans-burqa-20110410-191142-458.html#mwpphu-post-form